Police Constable A (PC A) saw the complainant (COM) walking across the road without using a nearby footbridge. PC A intercepted COM and informed him that he would be summonsed for ‘Jaywalking’. Upon receiving the summons, COM lodged a complaint of ‘Fabrication of Evidence’ against PC A alleging that the latter fabricated evidence to summons him as he was in fact riding on a bicycle and not walking across the road at the material time.
COM raised the same allegation in court but the Magistrate accepted PC A as an honest witness whose evidence reflected the truth and did not believe in COM’s version. The Magistrate commented in his verdict that if COM had ridden on a bicycle across the road at the material time, PC A could have prosecuted him for other more serious offences. After trial, COM was convicted of the charge of ‘Crossing within 15 metres of footbridge’ and fined $800.
As COM’s complaint was deemed fully resolved in court, the allegation of ‘Fabrication of Evidence’ was classified as ‘False’. |